Hello again! At the beginning of the year, I visited my friends somewhat abandoned and semi-closed villages of the Moscow region. In this regard, I present a new photo report. It will be told about the most memorable moments, abandoned houses, curious finds, subjects of rural life and other interests.
By the way, I am not very often writing from such places. A similar blog (just part 1) was last fall, you can see it. Prior to that there was still a pair of blogs in 2009 and 2010, but now I will not bother in search, I will get better right to the new part. So today's reportage is dedicated to the pair of villages and rustic houses in the Moscow region. All of them are different from the capital, but unites them alone - either the village is actively demolished, a couple of living houses remained. Or in the acting village there are deaf abandoned houses, in which no one has come for a hundred years, the windows are partially knocked out, and there is no fence. So far from everywhere, but since the capital is growing quickly, then many villages, falling into the hell of Moscow, gradually degrade. Also, it is not lucky next to the tracks, as well as, on the contrary, the village removed from residential agglomerations. For the most part, the homeless residents often live in such houses, and nothing interesting is found. But sometimes there are quite curious locations. Even wonder how so many vintage and enough rare things are preserved, interior items, old dishes and many other things. So, I post a photo in order to be proportionally interesting, and some places are quite emptied, and some, on the contrary. Go.
1. A typical house built before the revolution. Inside, no one lives, the door is a flaw, the windows are knocked out. We arrived here still cold in winter. Not the most interesting, but still.
2. Move for several tens of kilometers. We get into the house already more interesting. Lead to drink a seagull? In the corner we find the old chest, the table of the Viennese chairs. We raise the seats, find a label pre-revolutionary, trifle, and nice) on the table scattered many hours. By the way, the watches will also be a lot of hours.
3. The queue is another house. On the terrace we find the portrait of the Great Poet, unequivocally fell under the spit.
4. In one of the houses we find ancient piano. The same firm, by the way, as the piano, who elevated with one urodes in the abandoned school window (see Blog at the end). This, thank God, is still alive, but the keys are already seated. At the top of the piano, we find the Soviet domino set.
5. Another stopped clock. Conventional plastic, Soviet.
6. Sometimes at home come across completely destroyed, this, for example, collapsed the roof after a fire. The sofa looks somewhat insane.
7. And this is a house with Pushkin on the terrace. The floors rotted, the floor fails. For example, here, the wardrobe fell down.
8. Comething nearby near one abandoned garden at home.
9. In the attic, you can often find different curious things. In this house, for example, these are vintage objects of peasant life (spindles, rakes, forks, wooden shovel, sieve, etc.), notebooks of the 20s and 30s, textbooks of the same time, newspapers, Christmas tiles, china etc. On this frame, a radio receiver is still visible in a very poor condition of the 40s.
10. Typical cuisine in such houses. Old oven, water heater, beautiful, but dusty mirror and miscellaneous junk.
11. Children's dolls look always especially creepy.
12. Another curious room. Here we find a pre-revolutionary sewing machine "Singer", or rather a table from her and her own. Very unimportant condition. Time and dampness do their job. In the cabinets a bunch of old and half-breeding clothes.
13. I will show the base of the mill. Rusty letters "zinger" on the back.
14. In each rustic house there must be a red corner.
15. Along the way of residential buildings often come across local inhabitants)
16. Rusty Great was discovered on the terrace.
17. But in the room on the floor, curious hours are lying.
18. House in the village in a slight distance from the rest. Strange, by the way to say. The ceiling collapsed in the same room, in the second barely breathe it, the fence is actually no, the windows are knocked out, and the light in one of the rooms worked yet! Inside the traces of destroyed.
19. This leaflet hooked me very much. Learning a letter for the 20s. "Get up, curse jammed, the whole world of hungry and slaves!"
20. In the kitchen in an abandoned house. Under the legs come across letters, on the wall - an old radio receiver.
21. All hours show different times.
22. Cute wooden shelf.
23. Capital photography. The rug looks especially sad. Rus-Troika, where are you going? And the truth where ...
24. Soviet pinball. Curious thing, I have never seen before. Although the Chinese 90s saw full. Acho state.
25. One almost completely separated hut.
26. In the house with a frame 18. Buffet in the kitchen. Surprisingly perfect savor! As if two or three, no one lives, but no one lazal or did not beat. Although the tableware is context and frequent, so it is not surprising.
27. Notebooks of the 20th, 30s, this time closer. Decorated with portraits of Lunacharsky, Lenin, faces of peasants and pioneers. And of course, "proletaries of all countries, connect!".
28. In the house with 1 photos right on the threshold, we find such a wonderful chest
29. A bit of May nature from rustic sites \u003d)
30. And again we find pinball. The state is not very better.
31. One kitchen. It is strange that everything is just so thrown. Despite the apparent order, dishes under the layer of dust, the ceiling was already collapsed.
32. Cute pre-revolutionary buffet in a room with piano.
33. The frame did not fit the quality, but I still lay out. Interesting content. Notebook on geometry of 1929.
35. On this frame I want to finish today's photo report.
Very sad and severe impression produce similar abandoned houses. It seems that part of our culture leaves. The capital lifestyle changes the old established way. Is this good or bad? How much is progress, and what are we strive for? But it is rather philosophical questions, and everyone will have their own answer. Today is enough reasoning. Until the following reports!
It makes no sense to hide that abandoned villages and other settlements are an object of research for many people who are enthusiastic treasure devices (and not only) people. Here there is where to get raised and lovers of attic search, and "call" basements of abandoned houses, explore the wells and MN. DR. Of course, the likelihood that your colleagues visited you in this village or local residents are very high, but, nevertheless, "knocked out" does not happen.
Causes that lead to the destruction of villages
Before starting the transfer of reasons, I would like to dwell on terminology in more detail. There are two concepts - abandoned settlements and disappeared settlements. The disappeared settlements are geographical objects, today, fully ceased to exist due to hostilities, man-made and natural disasters, time. At the site of such items, the forest can now be observed, a field, water, anything, but not standing abandoned houses. This category of objects is also interesting to the treasures, but now we are not talking about them.
Abandoned villages just belong to the category of abandoned settlements, i.e. Takes, villages, farm, etc., abandoned by residents. Unlike the disappeared settlements, abandoned in most part retain their architectural appearance, buildings and infrastructure, i.e. There are in a state close to the time when the settlement was left. So people went away why? Decline in economic activity that we can observe now when people from the villages seek to move to the city; war; catastrophes of various character (Chernobyl and its surroundings); Other conditions making accommodation in this region uncomfortable, unprofitable.
How to look for abandoned villages?
Naturally, before going down the head of the head to the search place, it is necessary to prepare theoretical base, speaking simple words, Calculate these very estimated places. This will help us a number of specific sources and tools.Today, from the most accessible and enough informative sources is the Internet:
The second is quite popular and affordable source. - These are ordinary topographic maps. It would seem how can they be useful? Yes, very simple. First, the rats and non-residential villages have already been marked on enough famous cargos. It is important to understand one thing that the tract is not only an abandoned settlement, but also just any part of the terrain other than the rest of the surrounding areas. And yet, at the site of the village, there may have been no village for a long time, well, nothing, go with a metal detector among the pits, make a metalwork, and you look and lucky. With non-residential villages, not everything is simple. They may not be completely non-residential, but to be used, say, under the cottages or may be settled illegally. In this case, I see no reason to take anything, the problems with the law are not needed by anyone, and the local population can be quite aggressive.
If you compare the same map of the General Staff and more modern satin can notice some differences. For example, there was a village in the forest at the General Staff, the road was led to her and suddenly the road was disappeared on the more modern map, most likely the inhabitants left the village and began to bother with repair of roads, etc.
The third source is local newspapers, local population, local museums. Chat more with aborigines, interesting topics for conversation will always be found, and between the case you can ask about the historical past of this region. What can the locals tell about? Yes, a lot about what, the location of the manor, the Barsky Pond, where there are abandoned houses or even abandoned villages, etc.
Local media are also a fairly informative source. Especially now, even the most provincial newspapers are trying / trying to acquire their own sites, where they carefully lay out separate notes or even entire archives. Journalists are much going through their affairs, take interviews, including old-timers, who in the course of the stories like to mention various interesting facts.
Do not go to the provincial local lore museums. Not only are their expositions are often interesting, so the employee of the museum or guide can also tell you a lot of interesting things.
Topographic map of the Moscow province, engraved in the military topographic depot in 1860 by 40 sheets. Scale 2 versts in an English inch 1: 84000.
Considerable interest is not only the process of creating the card itself, but also the historical period of time preceded by its appearance.
At the end of the 18th century, a fundamental transformation of the cartographic business in Russia was accomplished, which posted the beginning of an independent military topographic service. Emperor Paul I, soon at the coming on the throne, paid special attention to the lack of Russia good cards and on November 13, 1796 issued a decree on the transfer of all GS cards at the disposal of General G.G. Kusheleva and the foundation of his imperial Majesty drawing, from which in August 1797 his own majesty depot of cards was created.
This act made it possible to make order to edition of cards and made the depot of cards by the centralized state archive of cartographic works in order to preserve the state and military secrets. At the depot, a specialized engraving part was established, and in 1800 the Geographical Department added to him. On February 28, 1812, the depot of maps was renamed the military-topographic depot with subordination to the military ministry. From 1816, the military topographic depot was transferred to the main headquarters of his imperial majesty. In terms of its tasks and organizations, the military topographic depot was mainly a cartographic institution. There was no topographical filming department, and the required number of officers from the army was introduced for the production of maps.
After the end of the war with Napoleon I, I significantly more attention was paid to field topographic-geodesic work. Military actions revealed a shortage of maps, and on that time the methods of warfare made a question about the need for large-scale cards, which, in turn, demanded a good and sufficiently thick network of supporting geodesic points and accurate topographical surveys. Since 1816, the triangulation of the Vilen province began, putting the priority development of triangulations in the country, and from 1819 regular topographic surveys on a tough scientific basis were organized. However, the implementation of geodesic and topographic works by a small number of officers of the apartment-building part, who among this mass of other official duties, have not allowed to begin the process of systematic and systematic mapping of the country.
In addition, the costs of the maintenance of topographic officers seemed too large. Therefore, the question of creating a specialized organization, completed from individuals of nevalian origin to perform surveys and geodesic works. Such an organization, which was applied to the military topographic depot, was formed in 1822 and became referred to as the corps of military topographers. The composition was completed from the most capable pupils of the military-orphans - the cantonists, the sons of the soldiers who belonged from the very birth of the military department in the serfdom then Russia. To prepare the personnel of the hull of military topographers in the same year, a military topographic school was founded. The hull of military topographers, established at the main headquarters of his imperial majesty, became a special organization for the implementation of geodesic works, topographic filming and preparation of a large number of highly qualified topographers.
The activities of the famous Russian geodesist and kartographer F.F. are closely connected with the housing of military topographs. Schubert, his hedgeon and the first director. Fedor Fedorovich Schubert (1789-1865) was elder of the children and the only son of an outstanding astronomer academician Fyodor Ivanovich Schubert (1758-1825). Until the eleventh-year-old age, he was brought up at home, and special attention was paid to mathematics and issuing languages. During this period, F. F. Schubert read a lot of books from the home library, as well as from the library of the Academy of Sciences, which his father was headed. In 1800, F.F. Schubert was determined in the Petropavlovsk school, renamed the School, without completing which, in June 1803, at the age of only 14 years, at the request of the father was transferred to the collaborate in GS.
GM-GMESTERSYASTER PK Suktekhen, a close friend of Fedor Fedor Fedorovich, instilled up the young man, dreaming about the maritime service, great love for the topographic and geodesic case. In 1804, F.F. Schubert was sent to two astronomical business trips, for the successful execution of the first of them, he was produced in the puddle. In the spring of 1805, he participated in a scientific expedition to Siberia under the leadership of his father, and in the summer of 1806 he was again engaged in astronomical works in Narva and Roer. From October 1806 and before February 1819, F. F. Schubert was in the existing army, taking part in hostilities against the French, Swedes and Turks. During the battlefield, in 1807, he was seriously wounded in his chest and left hand and hardly died at the attack of the shio. In 1819, F. F. Schubert is determined by the head of the 3rd separation of the Military Topographic Depot of the General Staff, and since 1820 he becomes the head of the triangulation and topographic shooting of the St. Petersburg province and in the same year receives the title of Major General.
In 1822, F. F. Schubert develops a draft provision on the hull of military topographers and soon becomes the first director of the established corps again. After 3 years, he is appointed by the manager, and since 1832, the Director (until 1843) of the Military Topographic Depot of the General Staff and the Council of the Academy of the GSH. In addition to posts F. F. Schubert from 1827 to 1837 was also the head of the Hydrographic Depot of the Chief Maritime Staff of His Imperial Majesty. The Board of these institutions Fedor Fedorovich successfully combined with a number of other no less responsible duties. It leads extensive trigonometric and topographic works In general, a number of provinces, he is engaged in the organization of the publication "Notes of the Military Topographic Depot" and "Notes of the Hydrographic Depot"; Makes up and issues "Guidelines for the calculation of trigonometric shooting and works of a military topographic depot", which served as a major allowance for topographs for several decades. June 20, 1827 F. F. Schubert was elected an honorary member of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences, and in 1831, for the difference in service, it was produced in Lieutenant General.
Fedor Fedorovich's cartographic works are largely important, a ten-weekly special map of the western part of Russia, known as "Schubert Maps", as well as its work devoted to the study of the species and size of the Earth. In 1845, F.F. Schubert becomes general from infanteria, and next year it is put by the director of the military-scientist committee of the General Staff, which he led to its abolition in 1859. With this abundance of responsible posts FF Schubert not only perfectly coped with the responsibilities entrusted to him, but also brought a lot of new things in the case of each institution, in which he was able to work, so his contribution to the development of the domestic military topographic service was very important, and the authority in the world scientist is very high.
Fedor Fedorovich's free from public service dedicated to Numismatics (in 1857, they were issued a detailed work on this issue). He owned four languages \u200b\u200bin perfectness, removed in music and painting, was a multifaceted, hardworking and cultural person.
With the name of General Schubert, the creation of a topographic map of the Moscow province was connected, which was engraved in the military topographic depot in 1860. As already mentioned above, since 1816, in Russia, large works began on laying triangulation and the production of topographic surveys based on a strict scientific basis. In 1820, he began his extensive triangulation work and F.F. Schubert. In the period from 1833 to 1839, under his leadership, a triangulation of the Moscow province was carried out, which was completely finished only by 1841. The big defects of the triangulation works F.F. Schubert was that he did not pursue the goal to get such high accuracywhich was inherent in the triangulation of K.I. Tunner and V.Ya. Struve, who led at that time similar works in Russia. F.F. Schubert attached to these works a purely utilitarian meaning - to support only for current topographic surveys, as, as the director of the military topographic depot, tried to get cards on the country's large territory. In addition, in its triangulations F.F. Schubert did not pay proper attention to the heights of the points, which was sharply felt when the lengths of the measured bases were to the sea surface. However, these shortcomings of the triangulation works of General Schubert with more than the high quality of instrumental topographic surveys, carried out under his leadership.
Rules for the production of filming over time were subjected to all sorts of variations. General provisionsThat faithful for most cases was as follows. Trigonometric points were intended for the basis for breaking the geometric network. Only the main objects of the area were instrumental: large roads, rivers, borders of the provinces. To this end, the method of serifs was widely applied; In forest spaces allowed to use Bussol. The main content of the card was depicted using a character. During the shooting, the relief was transmitted by horizontals with an indication of the corner of the rod of the area, and only the contours of the vertices and Talvegov were instrumentally applied. The relief has been drawn up in the chalk atmosphere with strokes in the Leemian system.
Topographic instrumental shooting in the Moscow province under the leadership of F.F. Schubert was produced in 1838-1839. At this time, only space in the counties of Moscow was shot. Shooting was conducted on a scale of 200 inch. Requirements that Fedor Fedorovich presented to field work performers were very high. Suffice to say that F.F. Schubert strictly remembered to use Busol, as she could not give the accuracy that could be achieved by removing forest roads with the help of Alidad. Subsequently, according to the materials of these filming, in 1848, a topographic map of the neighborhoods of Moscow on the scale of 1 versta in inches was released on 6 sheets. After a fairly long time, the shooting of the Moscow province was continued. In 1852-1853, they were carried out under the guidance of FingoFor's Major General and Rennenkopf and conducted on a scale of 500 chims.
Topographic surveys in the Moscow province were carried out by the forces of the host of military topographers, but we can hardly immediately establish immediate performers of field work, since their names on the 1860 map are missing. But on each of the 40 sheets, we can read the first name of the engrants of the military topographic depot, who prepared this card to the publication. In the fragment of this card presented to your attention, four incomplete sheets over each of which worked 6-7 people. Interestingly, among the latter there were two free engravers, invited from abroad: Egor Melas and Heinrich Bornmiller. These artists trained our engravers with the best European methods of engraving and themselves took direct participation in the works "For what, in 1864, the sovereign Emperor Highestly deigned to them to sue silver medals for wearing the Order of St. Stanislav, with the inscription" Zaiche "."
The original topographic map of the Moscow province of 1860 is an impression with copper engravings on 40 sheets + a prefabricated sheet, executed in one paint. The boundaries of the province and counties are manually raised with red watercolor paint. The map was drawn up in a trapezoidal pseudocylindrical multifaceted projection of müfling on a scale of 1:84,000 or, translated into a Russian system of measures, 2 versts in inches. When drafting a card, the topographic filming materials were used, produced in 1852-1853, but it should be noted that the shooting of 1838-1839 was also based on the creation of this card for those sheets that cover the territory of Moscow and the surrounding area. The content of the card is thorough. Of particular interest is the high skill of engravers, thanks to which all the card elements are perfectly read. The relief is perfectly engaged, especially the loop network: the smallest sings are drawn, which on the current topographic maps of a similar scale can be simply missed. The map signed a considerable number of different objects, which allows it to use it as the most valuable source of data on toponymics, as many hydroimes are partly lost - they do not meet any large-scale topographic map. Even in our time, after almost 140 years, with the help of this document, it is possible to quite confidently navigate in rural areas. It is not surprising that in soviet time The map presented was in the discharge of secret.
The history of lost, not survived to this day settlements is an important part of the history of the region.
Today we will tell about the village Lipovetsexisting in the XVI-I floor. XVIII centuries. On the territory of the housing cooperative (Zilkop) of the city settlement of Fryanovo Shchelkovsky district of the Moscow region, the village Gradino, in different times called Bavino, Brovkaino or Gridkovo, from the beginning of the XVI at the beginning of the twentieth century, located on the right bank of the river Dubenki opposite the village of Golovino, village Kopylovo In the XVI-I floor. XVIII century located between Maurino and Stepankovo, the village Luneau, In the XVIII - the first floor. XIX century Weighted on the right bank r. Celebrations near d. Bobras and Village with an unusual name BolophrustovoAt the beginning of the XVI - the first half of the XIX century. existing near the current Starpareeva ...
Lipovets
North of Fryanovo on the river Shero through the wasteland of Likhachikha (as in those days it was called "Endov") on the territory of the current housing cooperative of Fryanovo inXVI a century was the ancient village of Lipovets. She was listed in the victorian for Ivan the Mikitin Son Boskakov.
Ivan Mikitin Son Boscakov (Baskakov). Boskakov were relatives of the tooth, the westings of the owned villages Gradinawho was between and. Both origin took place from the Tatar Baskaka Amragata (Miragan), who accepted baptism with the name of Zechariah (Martyn).
One of the sons of the amragata, the parfunctions, who acted in the name of Pafnutiy died in 1478 and in 1540 was ranked in the face of Saints (Rev. Pafnuts Borovsky, 1394-1477). Another son, Ivan Boskakov died in the Kazan campaign of 1547. One of the descendants Baskakova, - Sharap Baskakov sold a number of his Votchin to the Troitsky Makhrishchi monastery, but this deal was challenged by Timothy the hood of Toporkov - another large wardrobe of the Schelkovsk region. Baskakov were among the ancient births of Central Russian counties, who had long-standing contacts with representatives of the administration of the Trinity-Sergievsky monastery.
Overcome Pafnuti Borovsky.
In the lists of serviceful people, tents 1577, the owner of the village of Lipovets, Ivan Mikitin Son Baskakov wasnoted as follows: "Squarers said from the villagers: they do not know EEO, it does not live from the vertany". In other words, the servant was not endowed with the land for the service, but he lived at the expense of his own victobin. The commentator of this mention believes that it is Ivan Mikitin Baskakov who belonged to the village of Lipovets.
The need for money was one of the reasons forcing the owners to part with tribal patrimony. In 1577/78, Ivan Baskakov sold his large village Alexino in the Cinelel village to the Sergiev Monastery. Despite the fact that Ivan Boscakova had a son, Evdokim Ivanovich, he gave the village of Lipovets with the Vodchinnikov Cathrook to the Suzdal Bishops' house. Later, in 1627, Evdokim tried to unsuccessfully to sue a number of informants of the father in the Trinity-Sergievsky monastery. Another son of Ivan Mikitina Boscakova, Ivan, served under the beginning of Ivan Vasilyevich Sitsky (? -1608), - then owner of the neighboring village. In 1586, I.V. Sitsky told Ivan Ivanovich Baskakov 350 more points in the Moscow district. Interestingly, the third son of Ivan Boskakova, - Grabhis Ivanov, the son of Boskakov, had a nephew of Deak Shemet Ivanov and, together with him, he entered the possession of Fryanovo. Wife Ivan Mikitin Son Boscakova was the sister of Shemet Ivanov.
So, in 1584-1586, the village of Lipovets, together with the Village of the village of Likhachikha (Endov), the Village of the village (Klimoshino, not far from), passed into the possession of the Suzdal Bishops: "The village of Lipovets, which was for Ivan for Boskakov, and in her the courtyard was lying, and the son of Samsonov's son lives in it" . Soon, the possessions of the Suzdal bishops were joined: the wisp of the climoshi (the territory of CJSC Fryanovskaya Factory), D. Poreevo (Starpareyevo) and non-existent villages of Bolohristovo and Iconnikov (Iconnikovskaya). The village of Lipovets, being in church possessions, launched in the first half - the middle of the XVIII century. On the maps of the general intertarization maps of 1766-1770, the terrain belonging to the savings collegium was as a waste of lipovitsy.
Gridino (Bavino, Brovko, Gridkovo)
On the right bank of the river Dubenki, on the contrary from the beginningXVI century for the first halfXX century was not existing now village Gridina. INXVI A century she was a generic victorian Ivan Zudov, who came from an old nobleman, who built to Tatar Baskaku Ambatu (Miragan), who was baptized with the name of Zechariah (Martyn) and the renofer of teeth and boscacons. Rodation of Ivan Zubova with boscackens, especially wonder that in the territory of the future Fryanovo in the possession of Ivan Boscakova was the village Lipovitsy. In addition, the son of Boscakova had to the nephew of Deca Shemet Ivanov and, together with him, he entered the ownership of Fryanovo. Information about the life and activities of Ivan Zubova is lost, but it is known that up to 1584-86 the village, which by that time a wastewhere passed into possession of his son: "For the Grigoria Ivanov Son of the Zuben's old father his father: a waste that was Gridin's village" .
In 1768, Gridin's village, named "Bavigina" with his lands and pulled the ruler, who was located on the other side of the Shero's river (on the map 1786-1791 - R. "Roshenka"), and was in possession of the village of the Stat Counselor. Sergey Ivanovich Protopopova.
D. Brovino on the map 1786-1791.
By 1812, the name of the village changes again. The village is called this time "Brinkino". Then she and the villagers have already owned by Sergey Ivanovich's widow, Anna Alekseevna Protopopova. Around 1816, the owner sells Salt's son of the famous architect, - the College Assorry A.I. Starovo, and the village of "Gridkovo" (Brovkino) sells Captain Anatoly Sergeevich Vyazemsky, who owned the village in those days. In 1852, 54 serf peasants lived in the seven households of the village of Gridkovo. After the cancellation of serfdom, and the redemption of land owner (1862) there were 8 yards and 58 people. At the end of the century, due to the outflow of the population from the village to earn money, the number of living in the village was reduced. Back in 1882, in 7 houses, the same number of the population lived in 7 houses as 20 years ago, but in 1890 (the same in 1899) only 20 peasants lived in the village. In the same, in 1890, at the village there was a master's yard-manor, which belonged to the hereditary honorary citizen Alexander Nikolaevna Smirnova.
After the revolution, in 1926 the Grating Village (Gridin) belonged to the Dubrovinsky village council. There were 12 households here, 37 people lived. When the village stopped existence in these places it is not exactly known. Now, nothing is already reminded of her, and the tireless waves of time erased and the memory of that once lived and died, they dreamed, worked and loved our ancestors.
Kopylova (Kopyl)
It is worth mentioning another old village that has not been preserved to our days, which existed in those days when the current village was empty. Between Maurino and, a little north also not survived village inXVI The century was now the not existing village of Kopylov. The name of the village received the name of his ancient owner of his older, who could be the Moscow Prince Parotner in Pskov, mentioned in 1510 Yuri Kopyl (Kopylov). Geographically, the village belonged to Thieves Corzenyev. The village was an old campaign ownership of the Natives - major victims of the Cinelel County. Until 1573, the unsushable son of Boyarsky Fedor Teplov Netolsky took the land of Mavrin's Empty. "Children's boyars" in those days were called representatives of the class of landowners from the grinding gods of Boyar or Boyarian warriors. Until 1584/1586, D. Kopylova, launched, and, apparently after the death of F.T. Nololsky, passed into possession of his sons: "For inexpensive for the peasant, yes for the Ontrushko for Fedorov's father's father's old father, their patrimony. Kopylova, that was the greatest Togo behind Fedor Nololsky, and in it the courtyard of the victims " . In 1596, Andrei Fedorov, Son Optolsky, was married to the local land (150 quarters) on Pereslavl Zalovsky. Andrei Fedorovich was listed by the disadvantaged and unresolute "Novikom", that is, a young man 15-18 years old, now, in 1596, who accepted for military service. Noviki, who received land salaries this year, amounted to the frames of the figures of the vague time. Together with him, the son of the owner of the Wooden Maurino of 1630 was also listed in the "tenth of Novikov" - Sidor Elizar'ev.
After a half century, in 1768, the empty of Kopylov belonged to the owner of the village of Gavrilkovo - Anna Vasilyevna Yeropkina, and after her, Olga Mikhailovna Preszova was passed on to possession of the surviving advisor. In 1852, the wastewhere was no longer mentioned.
Luneau
In the former times, Luneau was located a little west of the village on the same, right bank of the river. Crenitions are slightly upstream. Unfortunately, documents that could indicate the ancient origin of this lost village, not survived. Only her name can tell us about it. Many nobles of Lunes owned estates known to Russian history from the second halfXV century. Someone Philip Coptev Son Lunev was written in the suburbs of 250 cases of the Earth with a decay of Novikov in 1596.
Selo Luneo on the map 1786-1791
In 1768, which became the village of Luneo, was in hold of Countess Catherine Ivanovna Karamysheva (1716-?, In the Maiden's Tolstoy) - the wife of the Nikolai Fedorovich Karamyshev's wife. Ekaterina Ivanovna was the daughter of Count Ivan Petrovich Tolstoy (1685-1786) and Sofia Sergeyevna Stroganova (1824-1852). Then 40 souls of serfs lived in the village.
In 1812, the wife of the College Secretary, the sister of the owner of the neighboring village of Bobra Anna Karlovna Yanish, owned the village of Luneau. Sisters Anna and Elizabeth were the daughters of the professor of medicine, one of the first rectors of the Yaroslavl Demidov School of Sciences of the School, a popularizer of the chemical theory of light, Karl Ivanovich Yanish (1776-1853). During the invasion of Napoleon, Anna Karlovna provided 16 warrior warriors from the fortress peasants of the village of Luneo. In the second quarterXIX. a century Luneau comes to run and merges from the beavers village. On the map of Schubert, it is already referred to as the "Village of Bobra (Luneo)". In 1852, Selo was no longer mentioned.
Bolophrustovo
In the second halfXVI A century not far from Starpareeva in Mezhdrakhye Shrenniki and Kilene was not existing now an ancient victorious village that wearing a rather strange name of Bolophrulystovo. In the Szrevnevsky first part - "Bolo" is the root of the Valvesky word "Bolly" - "Good". This name of the village, indicated in the documents of 1573-1586, can indirectly indicate ancient times of the village and etymology of its name "Good (good) - Christ", ascending toXV century.
In the second quarterXVI century of the village owned Semen Pereztinwho took place from the ancient kind of Pereyaslav's markers who served in the Moscow Princes from the time of the Grand Duke Ivan Kalita. The greatest fame of the genquance of the Palace deserved the greatest fame (1578) - Daughty of Thomas Panteleevich Perezin, who, according to the review of the English diplomat Jils Fletcher was "The person is very wonderful between the natives in the mind and ramphism in the affairs of political ». Someone Ivan Perezin in 1450 owned villages and villages in the Cinema parish, located northeast of the Trinity-Sergiev Monastery on Pereyaslavskaya (Trinity) Road. Descendants of the looting - serviced people of Yakov and Vaska are mentioned in the documents of the vague time. It is only a reliably that Semyon Perezenin did not leave the heirs and handed over the village of Bolohristovo by the inheritance of his daughter "Mashka Semyon's daughter Peshinina", which owed it to a greater extent, Until 1584, when, as the worst patrimony, the village of Bolohristovo moved to the state of the state and entered the state local distribution.
A rich rustic economy, who left Votchin in the estate, was a gagged piece for any servant of the person of those years. Already in 1584-1586, the Village of Bolhristovo was divided into a two-owned owner: Ivan Olekseev Son Ugrimov and brothers Bochteyar and Cossack Mikitinov. According to the testimony of tubes: "For Bochteyar for Mikitin Son behind a lattice clerk, so beyond his brother for Kazan: Paul of the village of Bolohiristov, which was for the Mashka for the seed daughter of Poletin in Votchin, and in it the courtyard of therapists live in it Mahteyarov dazharinovi business people . The names of the brothers testify to their Tatar origin. Crimean Tatars who have passed to the Russian service and adopted by Orthodoxy, were made by the land in these places as directed by chapter
