Middle passing score in universities. Monitoring the quality of admission to universities

The section "" contains detailed information on the 2019 receiving campaign. Here you can learn about the passing points, competition, the conditions for providing a hostel, the number of free places, as well as the minimum points that needed to gain to receive it. The base of universities is constantly increasing!

- New service from the site. Now pass the exam will be easier. The project was created with the participation of specialists of a number of state universities and experts in the field of EGE.

In the section "Receive 2020" using the service "", you can learn about the most important dates related to admission to the university.

"". Now, you have the opportunity to directly communicate with the adoptive commissions of universities and ask them questions you are interested in. Answers will be posted not only on the site, but also will come to you personally in the mail that you indicated during registration. Moreover, fast enough.


Olympics in details are a new version of the section "" with an indication of the Olympics list for the current school year, their levels, references to the sites of the organizers.

The section has earned a new service "Remind about the event" with which applicants have the ability to automatically receive reminders of the most important dates for them.

Earned a new service - "

Passing points in universities 2015 on the budget Every year they change and depend on the current popularity of the university. If a huge number of applicants with a hundred points will come, then the passing balls are sharply up. It establishes only minimum balls for accepting applicants, relying on the results of the USE and its popularity.

Minimal EG Balls Mounted Rosobrnadzor

This year Rosobrnadzor set the following minimum balls on the exam: Social Studies - 39, Russian Language - 36, Informatics - 40, Biology - 36, Geography - 37, Chemistry - 36, Physics - 36, Literature - 32, History - 32, Mathematics - 24, Foreign Language - 20. These balls need to be dial On the exam to get the standings. Based on this, it is possible to distinguish the items that the government considers the acquired and those who ignore which says goodbye to students. Thus, informatics and social studies are the most important subject, then there is a number of technical, natural sciences from biology, geography of physics and chemistry. Knowledge in literature, stories are not particularly needed, and mathematics and foreign language are generally unnecessary. But it is not clear how the student should gain in physics one and a half times more points than in mathematics. And why the Russian language is valued more than history, including domestic. Many are rejoicing that the requirements for a foreign language are low, but joy will pass when graduates of schools will begin to look for work and will see in demands on the knowledge of knowledge of the English language. How to fly at least such points? Train! Come with the results and correct answers on the educational portal "learn here"

Required points for admission to universities

For admission to most universities for any specialty 270 points in the amount of three subjects are enough. This means that it is necessary to take the exam for 90 points. To have a large list of strong institutions and universities, 230 points will be enough, and get 75 points on the exam. The most important requirements for the points of the MEPI with the specialty information and analytical security systems. For admission to this specialty, 284 points will need in the amount of Russian, mathematics and physics. For admission to the financial university, the economy will require 283 points in mathematics, Russian language and social studies

Investigation of the quality of admission to Russian universities "Higher School of Economics" and the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia, together with Mia Russia today, has been held for five years since 2011. The study is based on the analysis of the information presented on the sites of higher educational institutions, which is checked with these reports of universities in the Ministry of Education and Science. If necessary, data is accusable with admissions of universities.

The results of the study (often they are called the monitoring of the quality of admission) are widely used primarily by applicants that make a decision on the choice of university and educational program, as well as universities themselves to analyze their position in the higher education market. The Ministry of Education and Science of Russia and the leadership of Russian regions rely on the results of monitoring when evaluating the work of universities and developing educational policies.

By tradition, the first part of the study is the results of enrollment on budget places - it seems to be the Minister of Education and Science of Russia and the Rector of HSE in early September. In October, the second part of the study is published, which includes an analysis of paid reception (the number of enrolled, average score and the cost of training), as well as its comparison with the quality and size of the budget set.

Monitoring includes only full-time training, as well as only those universities, the reception in which is determined by the EGE contest and the Olympiads. The monitoring does not participate creative universities and universities of power departments.

General observations

  • The average scores of the EE enrolled in budget places, as a rule, on 5-6 points above the middle scores of the EE enrolled in paid places - this ratio is maintained throughout the entire monitoring.
  • According to the total number of applicants for the 1st course, the budget set is about two times higher than the paid one.

Fig. 1. Medium Points of EE enrolled on budget and paid places and the total number of first-year students, 2011-2016

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
wed Balle Ege enrolled in budget places 63,6 63,5 67,2 64,3 65,7 66,6
enrolled in budget places, people. 286 621 302 656 299 822 281 583 288 154 275 566
cf. Balle Ege enrolled in paid places 57,5 56,6 61,9 57,3 60,3 60,8
enrolled in paid places, people. 99 131 151 581 158 335 148 393 136 386 154 293
  • Most of all applicants come to classic universities and technical universities.

Fig. 2. Distribution of freshmen for universities of different profiles, 2016

  • In general, in Russia, the highest middle scores of the EE entrancers demonstrate medical universities. Weak applicants are more in technical, pedagogical and agricultural universities.

Fig. 3. Medium points of the EE enrolled on budget and paid places, by universities of different profiles, 2011-2015

Table 1. Top 20 universities with the highest medium scam points among enrolled in budget places, 2011-2015

Popular preparation directions

How much of the profession is attractive in the eyes of applicants and their families, can indirectly evaluate, comparing 1) the shares of winners and winners of the Olympiad among those enrolled in various areas of preparation (since this group of applicants is most freight in the choice of university) and 2) Enrolled in paid places (as this group of applicants chooses where to invest their own means).

The absolute leader remains the direction of "international relations": the share of "Olympiants" in it reaches 13% (and this is the largest share among all directions), and the enrolled in paid places make up three quarters of the entire set.

In general, by the share of paid reception, social and humanitarian preparation directions are noticeably ahead of technical.

Table 2. Groups of preparation directions with the largest (more than 70%) and the smallest (less than 5%) paid set

Group of directions Enrolled in 2015 in total, people Of these, credited to paid places,%
large 3973 77,9
Economy 35526 77,7
International relationships 4063 77,4
6339 76,7
Jurisprudence 23129 73,1
small 3782 4,8
Rural and fisheries 16656 4,7
Technological machines and equipment 7578 4,6
Geography 2319 4,4
9429 4,4
Water transport management 1050 3,9
Printing and packaging 332 3,6
Forest case 3067 3,4
Technology light industry 807 2,4
Armament 719 1,9
Metallurgy 1492 1,9
Materials 1839 1,5
Sea machinery 1772 1,4
Soil science 297 1,0

The same preparation directions are chosen for themselves and preferential categories of incoming: their share is most high (from 7 to 8.5%) in the directions "State and Municipal Management", "Economics", "Jurisprudence", "Advertising and Public Relations", "International Relations", "Management".

Table 3. Directions of training, among those enrolled on which the share of applicants with special rights exceeds 7%, 2015

According to the share of Olympics, the composition of the leaders' directions is less neglect: along with humanitaries, physics, mathematics and chemistry occupy noticeable positions.

Table 4. Directions of preparation, among the enrolled on which the share of winners and winners Olympiads exceeds 4%, 2015

Group of directions Share of Olympiants,%
International relationships 4063 13,38
Physics 5240 7,28
Oriental Science and Africanist 1310 6,85
Theory of Arts 438 6,67
Design 2801 6,48
7735 5,35
Public Advertising and Communication 3973 5,01
Mathematics 10463 4,93
Nuclear Physics and Technology 1201 4,59
Economy 35526 4,51
Chemistry 3144 4,25

The needs of enterprises and organizations, regional and municipal authorities, expressed in the profile of the target set, focus on the basic professions for society: doctors, teachers, lawyers and technicians in the field of transport.

Table 5. Directions of training, among the accrued on which the share of "Keevikov" exceeds 15%, 2015

Group of directions Enrolled on budget and paid places of all, people Share "Keevikov",%
Health 41310 50,12
Aviation and Rocket and Space Technology 3782 44,59
Aviation Systems (Operation) 1712 28,90
Armament 719 23,26
Vehicles 13315 21,86
Electronic equipment, radio engineering and communication 9429 19,59
Jurisprudence 23129 19,44
Teacher Education 27978 16,78
Oil and gas business 3194 16,47
Mechanical engineering 2286 16,22
Sea machinery 1772 15,28

Strong and weak preparation directions

University 2015 (place in ranking) 2014 (place in the ranking) 2013 (place in the ranking) 2012 (place in ranking) 2011 (place in the ranking) Enrolled on the budget 2015 Sr. Balle Ege (budget) 2015 Enrolled on the budget 2014 Sr. Balle Ege (budget) 2014 Credited to the budget 2013 SR BALL EGE (budget) 2013 Credited to the budget 2012 Sr. Balle Ege (budget) 2012 Credited to the budget 2011 Sr. Balle Ege (budget) 2011
St. Petersburg Academic University - Nanotechnology Scientific and Education Center 1 59 95,5
2 1 1 1 1 436 94,7 416 93,8 450 96,5 463 93,7 448 93,7
3 2 3 3 3 890 93,8 926 92,7 944 93,6 867 91,2 854 90
4 3 2 2 2 1989 91,5 1873 91,4 2102 94,2 1596 93,4 1721 90
5 9 4 6 8 208 89,4 187 85,5 185 90,6 171 86,8 175 84,4
6 4 7 9 9 2340 88,1 2365 88 2640 89 2915 84,2 2887 82,6
7 7 6 7 7 3848 87,1 3919 86,3 3998 89,3 3829 86,6 3912 85,6
8 10 16 37 36 475 86,3 607 84,8 865 85 1249 77,2 1215 76,9
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service under the President of the Russian Federation, Moscow 9 8 17 11 13 611 85,6 640 86 575 85 561 83,3 511 81,1
State Institute of Russian Language. A.S. Pushkin, Moscow 10 11 8 8 5 75 85,6 46 83,5 42 87,6 42 85,7 40 89
11 15 21 14 34 529 84,6 621 82,8 697 84,4 444 82 474 77,8
Samara State Economic University 12 28 67 65 50 204 84 212 79,2 259 77,9 219 74,3 218 75,1
13 5 5 12 19 620 83,2 565 87,8 592 90,1 573 82,9 592 80,7
14 6 9 4 4 1034 83 1032 87,3 1398 87,4 628 91,1 582 89,4
St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics 15 12 26 15 20 1122 82,7 1173 83 1282 83,6 1372 81,9 1377 80,2
Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University. ON THE. Dobrolyubov 16 19 14 13 25 177 82,7 181 80,7 167 85,3 167 82,5 169 79,1
17 18 13 29 29 576 82,6 449 81 540 85,3 510 79,2 554 78,5
St. Petersburg State University of Technology and Design 18 34 48 49 71 481 82,5 441 78 385 80,9 409 75,7 500 72,5
Russian Academy of Justice, Moscow 19 20 20 5 6 83 82,5 91 80,4 102 84,5 87 87,8 78 86
20 14 11 10 17 866 82,3 1142 82,8 1146 85,6 926 83,3 850 80,9
21 16 12 20 10 943 82 930 82,7 895 85,4 791 81,3 760 82
First State Moscow Medical University. THEM. Sechenov 22 25 10 26 16 1262 81,8 1392 79,6 1351 86,1 1084 80,2 990 80,9
24 13 28 27 58 1341 81,2 1024 83 1056 83,3 932 79,7 1084 74,2
St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University 25 24 24 18 21 430 81 455 79,7 445 83,7 445 81,5 439 80
30 31 15 17 14 425 80 420 78,5 366 85,1 375 81,9 392 81,1
St. Petersburg State University of St. Petersburg 31 42 40 25 18 772 79,7 1035 76,7 696 81,5 702 80,4 678 80,9
36 17 18 31 15 367 79,3 359 81,4 345 85 341 78,5 334 81,1
Moscow State Technical University. AD Bauman. 42 52 27 22 11 3088 78,5 2968 75,5 2824 83,3 2520 81,1 2756 81,3
Literary Institute. A.M. Gorky, Moscow 49 21 33 19 22 91 77,5 91 80 82 82,6 71 81,4 71 79,5
58 26 19 34 12 635 75,8 592 79,4 452 84,7 474 77,9 350 81,3
Dagestan State Medical Academy, Makhachkala 131 94 29 16 23 485 69,9 486 71,2 485 83 467 81,9 484 79,4

Table 9. Top 20 universities in terms of paid reception (2011-2015)

University 2015 (place in ranking) 2014 (place in the ranking) 2013 (place in the ranking) 2012 (place in ranking) 2011 (place in the ranking) Called for payments 2015 Sr. Balle Ege enrolled in payments 2015 Enrolled in paid places 2014 CR Balle Ege enrolled in payments 2014 Enrolled in paid places 2013 Sr. Balle Ege enrolled in payments 2013 Enrolled in paid places 2012 CR Balle Ege enrolled in payments 2012 Enrolled in paid places 2011 CR Balle Ege enrolled in payments 2011
Moscow Physics and Technology 1 2 3 3 4 149 82,5 74 78,9 119 80,9 113 77,7 60 76,1
Moscow State Institute of International Relations 2 1 1 1 3 645 81,3 716 78,9 748 84,9 597 79,4 538 78,8
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 3 3 2 2 5 1965 79,3 914 77,8 1577 81,1 1145 77,9 889 75,8
St. Petersburg State University 4 5 9 13 13 774 77,3 890 75 1266 76,3 1298 69 972 68,1
National Research Nuclear University "MIII", Moscow 5 9 32 53 62 305 76 66 71,8 353 69,7 340 61,7 251 60,8
Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov 6 6 4 4 6 1807 74,3 1431 72,4 1352 78,3 1450 73,5 1339 72,7
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Branch, St. Petersburg 7 8 14 12 19 498 74,3 300 72 108 73,7 88 69,1 51 66,3
First St. Petersburg State Medical University. I.P. Pavlova 8 7 6 6 33 415 72,6 253 72,2 345 77,6 195 71,9 222 63,3
All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade, Moscow 9 12 8 10 20 347 72,5 373 69,1 362 76,5 371 69,2 227 66,2
Moscow Institute of Electronics and Mathematics "Higher School of Economics" 10 10 17 28 91 63 71,1 12 70,4 35 72,8 28 64,6 24 58,2
Russian National Research Medical University. N.I. Pirogova, Moscow 11 60 45 42 72 533 70,7 367 61,6 623 67,7 481 62,7 214 59,3
Moscow Architectural Institute (State Academy) 12 113 101 161 134 70,6 129 62,5 98 57,4 97 55,5
Russian University of Economics. G.V. Plekhanova, Moscow 13 34 37 39 30 705 70,4 1445 63,9 1211 69,3 955 62,9 725 63,4
Novosibirsk National Research State University 14 11 28 19 311 501 70,4 557 69,5 605 71 705 66,2
Moscow State Legal University. O.E. Kutafina 15 26 20 22 32 269 70,2 406 65,8 498 71,9 420 65,2 327 63,3
Kazan State Medical University 16 15 12 7 41 405 69,9 266 68,2 371 74,3 152 71,3 268 62,4
Tver State Medical University 17 29 15 21 46 180 69,9 166 64,3 190 73,7 188 65,6 144 62
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Branch, Nizhny Novgorod 18 18 22 57 29 58 69,9 57 67,5 146 71,5 91 61,4 103 63,8
Russian Customs Academy, Lyubertsy 19 99 67 37 45 168 69,3 236 59,3 249 66 193 63,4 96 62,1
Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar 20 22 16 16 12 562 69,1 588 66,8 650 73,5 530 67,3 319 68,4
universities included in the top 20 in 2011-2014.
Moscow State Linguistic University 22 4 11 11 15 198 68,9 18 75,2 110 74,6 206 69,1 91 67,5
South Federal University 26 20 31 96 75 187 68 45 67,4 310 70 1026 58 276 59
Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg 28 49 21 18 84 270 67,6 286 62,8 292 71,9 261 66,5 279 58,6
St. Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation 29 62 76 103 11 596 67,2 683 61,4 592 64,7 547 57,3 375 69
Voronezh State Medical University. N.N. Burdenko 30 13 10 8 8 382 67,1 368 68,8 398 75,6 449 69,3 542 70,5
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow 32 19 29 9 10 1301 66,8 985 67,4 785 70,5 545 69,3 532 69,2
Moscow State Medical and Dental University 43 14 19 334 7 400 65,8 531 68,4 542 71,9 92 72,4
Izhevsk State Medical Academy 58 40 50 66 2 171 64 110 63,5 141 67,1 183 60,1 146 79,3
Rostov State Medical University 62 46 5 5 21 463 63,6 328 63 245 77,7 190 72,5 169 65,7
Moscow State University Press 72 41 18 20 53 472 62,6 260 63,3 256 72,1 249 66,1 249 61,4
Moscow State Humanitarian University. MA Sholokhov 78 16 70 71 51 108 62,5 111 68,1 190 65,8 344 59,8 80 61,5
St. Petersburg State Technological Institute (Technical University) 85 17 251 221 288 428 62,1 226 68 1003 57,1 845 53,3 510
Russian State University of Oil and Gas. THEM. Gubkin, Moscow 87 63 47 26 16 466 62 556 61,4 559 67,5 527 64,7 402 66,9
South Russian Institute of Management - Branch of Ranjigs, Rostov-on-Don 112 78 65 51 17 322 61,2 369 60,5 371 66 357 61,9 371 66,9
North Ossetian State Medical Academy, Vladikavkaz 118 58 7 14 1 88 61 89 61,8 127 76,6 97 67,8 99 81,5
Stavropol State Medical University 119 108 13 17 14 321 60,8 338 59 335 74,1 318 66,5 253 67,9
Ural Institute of Management - Branch of Ranjigs, Yekaterinburg 131 112 30 15 22 295 60,1 103 58,8 72 70,5 90 67,8 23 65,6
Samara State Medical University 134 27 41 33 9 265 60 240 64,6 206 68,4 278 63,8 255 69,9
Togliatti State University 173 158 239 267 18 466 58,1 494 56,2 505 57,5 515 51,8 439 66,8

Training Structure and Paid Reception

Five groups of directions can be distinguished by the ratio of paid and budgetary admission of students.

First groupThe most numerous (28 directions of 66) - paid reception is insignificant, less than 10% of the budget. Including this group includes six directions out of ten, having the largest budget admission: "Agriculture", "Transport", "Energy", "Mathematics", "Electronics" and "Ecology". The fact that there are practically no pay students in these areas, reflects primarily the traditional "overproduction" of frames in budget places.

Second group- There is a paid reception, but small: from 10 to 35% of the budget. Such directions 11 out of 66, the largest - "pedagogy" and "construction". As a rule, applicants of these areas consider their prospects of future employment as good, but do not count on a quick career.

Third group - Paid reception from 36 to 80% of the budget, roughly corresponds to the share of paid reception in the system of higher education as a whole. This can be said, the optimal combination: paid students bring university with a tangible additional income, while the university is not very much depends on them and can, respectively, to conduct a fairly principled quality control policy. This group includes 13 destinations, the largest - "health care", where 25 thousand posts accounted for 25,000 budget first holidays. Applicants enrolled on educational programs in these areas have pronounced career expectations and are configured to sufficiently high income in the future.

Fourth group - Paid reception ranges from 81 to 150% of the budget. A paid set for universities of this group is almost as important as the budget, but the latter everything remains a "reference link" in the economy of the university and the formation of his personnel policy (the absolute majority of teachers - at low cost and only receive surcharges due to paid set). There are only five such directions: "Design", "Business Informatics" and "Service Sphere", as well as having a small set of "Publishing" and "Theory of Arts".

Finally, fifth group Includes nine directions, a paid reception to which more than twice (and often in three or four) exceeds the budget. Here, as a rule, a completely different economy: some of the teachers are framed at "extrabudgetary" rates, and paid students define the quality of the audience. The university is forced to navigate on paid students in their quality policy. Among the largest directions of this group - "Economics", "Jurisprudence", "Management", "Linguistics and foreign languages", "State and Municipal Management", "Advertising" and "International Relations".

Table 10. Groups of Directions with the greatest budget reception

Group of directions Enrolled in budget places, thousand people.2015 / 2014 Enrolled in paid places, thousand people, 2015/2014 Notes
Health 24,5 / 23,8 17,2 / 16,2 70%
Pedagogy 21,5 / 22,5 6,3 / 5,4 30% Growth in the quality of budget and paid reception; Rising prices
Computer Science and Computer 18,5 / 17 2,5 / 2,6 13%
Agriculture 16 / 16 0,8 / 1,3 5%
Building 13,5 / 13,5 2,9 / 2,2 21% Rising prices
Vehicles 12,5 / 12 0,8 / 0,6 6%
Energy 11,5 / 11,5 0,8 / 0,5 7%
Mathematics 9,5 / 9,1 0,8 / 0,7 8% Rising prices and quality of paid reception
Electronics, Radio Engineering and Communication 9 / 8,7 0,4 / 0,3 5% A slight decline in prices
Ecology 8,5 / 8 0,8 / 1,1 9% Rising prices

Table 11. Groups of directions with the highest paid reception

Group of directions Enrolled in budget places, thousands person.2015 / 2014. Enrolled in paid places, thousands person.2015 / 2014. The share of paid reception of relative budget Notes
Economy 7,9 / 8,9 28 / 33,5 356% The only major direction where the budget reception control numbers decreased. Relief quality of paid reception of the amount of quantity
Health 24,5 / 23,8 17,2 / 16,2 70%
Jurisprudence 5,7 / 5,3 16,5 / 15 289% Growth of budget and paid reception
Management 7,7 / 7,4 14 / 20 179% Sharp reduction of paid reception with quality growth and considerable price increase
Pedagogy 21,5 / 22,5 6,3 / 5,4 30% Growth of the quality of budget and paid reception, price increase
Linguistics and foreign languages 2,9 / 2,8 5,2 / 4 181% Growth in the quality of budget reception; sharp increase in the number of paid reception with a sharp rise in prices
State and Municipal Office 1,5 / 1,5 4,9 / 8 331%
Service sector 3,9 / 3,8 4,4 / 5,6 113% Sharp reduction of paid reception with quality growth and considerable increase in prices
Public Advertising and Communication 0,9 / 0,7 3,3 / 3,3 378%
International relationships 0,9 / 1,0 3,2 / 2,9 348%

It can be seen that the list of the largest budget directions and the list of the largest paid directions intersect only in two cases: according to "Health and Pedagogy". This is the result of the fact that the Ministry of Education and Science has reduced the budget reception for the three most popular paid groups over the past few years, "economy", "jurisprudence" and "management". The reduction reflects, among other things, the policy of displacing frankly weak educational programs implemented by non-contaminate universities that have no sufficient personnel potential. Such a policy began with "circumcision" of the budget reception, but affects both paid: a number of universities recently turns the relevant programs.

Traditionally paid reception is carried out primarily on socio-economic and humanitarian directions, as well as medical. If in the structure of the budget reception, they occupy 27%, then in the structure of paid - about 87%. Natural sciences (directions of classical universities) occupy about 14% in the budget reception, while in a paid set of their share a little exceeds 2%. The share of technical sciences and technologies accounts for over 40% of the budget set and only 10% paid. Such a structure is generally reproduced throughout the entire observation period (2011-2015) with variations in the range of 3-5%. See Table. 10.

Table 12. The structure of the budget and paid reception in the context of the branches of knowledge, 2011-2015

Budget reception 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
s / x science,% 6,5 6,7 6,4 6,4 6,0
humanitarian sciences, % 7,8 7,7 8,0 7,6 8,0
natural Sciences, % 14,1 13,8 13,8 14,0 14,5
medical sciences,% 8,6 8,5 7,3 6,9 7,1
pedagogical sciences,% 10,6 11,2 11,5 11,8 11,1
social sciencies, % 10,5 11,0 12,0 13,0 13,4
technical science, % 41,9 41,1 41,0 40,3 40,0
A total of people enrolled 288 808 282 474 307 046 314 752 301 327
Paid reception 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
s / x science,% 0,6 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,8
humanitarian sciences, % 22,9 18,6 18,5 16,9 19,2
natural Sciences, % 2,3 2,5 2,8 3,3 2,7
medical sciences,% 12,3 11,0 11,2 9,9 11,2
pedagogical sciences,% 6,1 4,7 4,6 4,6 3,9
social sciencies, % 45,1 53,8 53,1 53,0 52,3
technical science, % 10,7 8,3 8,7 11,3 9,8
A total of people enrolled 135 524 147 660 157 878 153 389 99 620*

Comparison of the quality of budget and paid reception - 2015

Traditionally paid education is chosen by more weak students, and here the threshold is set - or they are not asked - the universities themselves.

More than half of the "Troechniki" (the average score of the EGE below 56) for paid training in 2015, 150 universities from 412, included in the rating (36%). This is a significant improvement in the situation - last year there were 198, almost half (48%).

Table 13. Distribution of universities in the quality of budget and paid reception

The bulk of students who independently pay for their full-time education are no longer "triens". These are "good". What is the associated shift? You can make two assumptions. The first - students of 2015 as a whole passed a little better than the exam. The second - there was polarization both between universities and within groups of directions. In popular universities, students are ready to act on a paid form, at that time outsiders remain the weakest applicants, including a budget form.

The diagrams below compare the quality of the budget set with the quality of paid set. On the axis, the middle score of the paid set is postponed, along the X axis - the average score of the budget set. The color of "peas" reflects the quality of paid set: green - medium score above 70, white - medium score below 70 and above 56, red - medium scores below 56. In classic universities universities with "excellent" budget reception (medium score above 70) on Paid places are most often gaining applicants "good" (medium score 56-70). In technical universities, where according to the group as a whole, more "good", up to half of the paid set - "Troekhniki" (average score below 56), but it can be seen that "triples" are usually universities with a large set.

Applicants and their families began to better distinguish the quality of educational programs, their contribution (as well as the contribution of the university brand) into the human capital of students. In 2015, the Year of the Russian Federation for the first time announced data on average earnings and professional employment of university graduates. If earlier, information that graduates of top universities earn an average of 1.5 times more than graduates of other universities in the same direction, discussed at the level of individual cases, opinions and rumors (forming, nevertheless, public opinion), Now this tendency can be considered proven.

There is a change in the structure of the state assignment - the expansion of engineering directions, further reduction in socio-economic (due to economics and business informatics). It is assumed that the population imposes a sufficient effective demand for the programs of socio-economic and humanitarian directions, which makes it possible to do without increasing budget support.

Many universities that have not received the state in the implementation of popular educational programs (economics, management, etc.), continued to receive applicants on them completely on extra-budgetary basis. It demanded personnel and information support of programs that at universities in such a situation weakened significantly. The result is: a paid set in these universities is reduced, in other cases dropping to the level, critical for further continuation of such programs.

In the risk zone, universities that are gaining paid programs are not supported by the budget set at the appropriate direction, less than 30 students. After all, firstly, a paid student is usually prepared weaker than a budget place that received in a budget place, and therefore it risks more in the number of no longer. Secondly, such a student may stop learning not only due to failure, but also for reasons of financial nature. Already in the third year, less than half of the initially recruited students can remain, and funds coming from them will not be enough even to pay for the necessary teachers.

2015 can be a referee for about 60% of the currently existing purely extra-budgetary programs in the "Economics" directions, "Management", "Jurisprudence" and other socio-economic and humanitarian areas: In 2016, these programs may stop the new set (in 2015 they They scored less than 30 people).

Dynamics of reception quality, 2011-2015

The highest quality of the budget set is stably preserved in medical and socio-economic universities, and in the latter for the period from 2011 to 2015. Green zone (the average score above 70) significantly expanded. Agricultural universities remain mainly in the "Red Zone" (the middle score of the university is below 56). Among the classical universities and technical universities, the proportions of universities- "excellent students", "good" and "triples" are approximately the same and keep without special changes. The quality of budget reception in pedagogical universities has noticeably increased.
In a paid set, in general, the same proportions are preserved, albeit with a certain shift to lower points.

Price strategies for universities in economic recession

Among the universities offering paid programs in 2015, 47% compared to 2014 increased prices, 36% have retained them unchanged in nominal terms, 17% found it necessary to reduce prices (as significant we considered changes more than 5 thousand rubles in year). At the same time, 14 universities raised the average total of 50-100 thousand rubles per year; 39 universities - by 20-50 thousand rubles per year; 124 universities - by 5-20 thousand rubles per year; 137 universities did not change the cost or changed it slightly (within 5 thousand rubles), 58 universities reduced the cost of training for 5-20 thousand rubles, and 8 universities were 20-50 thousand rubles.

At the same time, the behavior model is the distribution of universities on groups of increasing and lower prices - differ in directions. Preparation: With regard to socio-economic and humanitarian programs, on the one hand, and technical programs, on the other, universities are more often adhered to different strategies. Among the technical directions are noticeably higher than the proportion of programs that reduce the cost of studying in 2015 among socio-economic programs prevailing those who raised the cost of learning relatively slightly (5-20 thousand rubles).

So, in the direction of "economy", 305 universities were paid in 2015, 30 of them increased the cost of more than 20 thousand rubles per year, 95 universities - 5-20 thousand rubles and 18 universities reduced the cost of 5- 60 thousand rubles. In the direction of "jurisprudence", a paid set in 2015 was conducted by 181 universities, of which 26 universities raised the cost of more than 20 thousand rubles per year, 63 universities - by 5-20 thousand rubles and 6 universities decreased costs for 5-60 thousand . rubles. At the same time, in the direction of "Informatics and Computing Technique" more than a third of universities lowered prices by more than 5 thousand rubles, and in the direction of "energy and energy engineering" of such universities almost half.

Table 14. Changing the cost of training in the preparations, 2014-2015


What are the differences in the pricing policy of metropolitan and regional universities? Price variation amongexpensive educational programs significantlyhigher than among moderate value programs. At the same time, the proportions of expensive and inexpensive programs in different directions of preparation are about the same. There are three strategies for universities price policies: a single cost for all educational programs (demand is determined by the quality of the program and the reputation of the university); Program price differentiation; Segmentation of programs for popular and unpopular.

Strong universities, which is expected, set high minimum points. In the "dozen" of the strongest universities in the quality of budget intake, the average minimum score is 61.3 points (based on one subject for all universities) - against 34.2 in the thresholds of Rosobrnadzor. The highest points among the leaders universities established MIPT, MEPI, HSE, St. Petersburg Academic University - Nanotechnology Scientific and Educational Center. The lowest - MGIMO and Moscow State University them. Lomonosov (other things, it did not affect the high quality of admission to these universities). But among 74 universities from the "Red" zone (the average score of the EE enrolled in budget places in them below 56) None set the minimum threshold above the level proposed by Rosobrnadzor.

Only 15% of universities use minimal scores as a real tool for selecting applicants.

Universities that have established the highest passage points in 2015:

  • Baltic Federal University. I. Kanta
  • All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade, Moscow
  • State Institute of Russian Language. A.S. Pushkin, Moscow
  • State UN-T Governance, Moscow
  • Kuban State University, Krasnodar
  • Leningrad State. University. A.S. Pushkin, St. Petersburg
  • Moscow State Humanitarian University. MA Sholokhov
  • Moscow Institute of Electronics and Mathematics NiU "Higher School of Economics"
  • Moscow Physics and Technology
  • Nat. Issh. Tomsk Polytechnic University
  • Nat. Issh. UN-T "Higher School of Economics", Moscow
  • Nat. Issh. Nuclear University "Miphy", Moscow
  • Novosibirsk Nats. Issh. State UN-T.
  • Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service under the President of the Russian Federation
  • Russian Economic University. G.V. Plekhanov
  • Samara state. UN-T.
  • St. Petersburg State. UN-T.
  • St. Petersburg Nats. Issh. University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
  • Smolensk state. UN-T.
  • Tver State UN-T.
  • Ural Federal University. B.N. Yeltsin
  • Southern Federal University

Directions of training that universities are more often installed by high passing points.