Good day, dear applicants. Many of you are interested in what happened behind the scenes of the early USE 2016. This was preceded by dozens of messages in my personal VKontakte and I will open the veil of mystery for you, tell you about my impressions of checking the second part and we will analyze with you the real version of the second part and tell you about what the early USE looks like in the history of this year
Impressions from the early stage
Let's start with my impressions of the first part, which, I confess, I saw briefly. But with a quick run through the variant, I can say the following: the early USE was not difficult. I will justify this on real assignments. As you know, this year the structure of all work has been radically altered - the test part has been removed and the tasks of the current first have been shoveled. According to a quick analysis of the option, the first five tasks and No. 7-9, 11 were given without any difficulties to those who worked out the dates and worked with official documents, including the list of dates from the FIPI. There would be no surprises, as I believe, for a prepared person.
Then you are greeted with the following type of tasks: work with a map and illustrative material. From the maps I can recall the map of the settlement of the tribal unions of the Eastern Slavs, there was a map on the era of feudal fragmentation, the Battle of Kursk met, the socio-economic development of Russia in the XIX century ... Something, of course, could cause difficulties, but there were no surprises from the compilers , like the names of merchants / names of plants and factories, like last year
"Pictures" pleased most of the entrants. The only difficulty was caused by a comrade, whose famous children's song is attached below. Who found out, write in the comments 🙂 It was necessary to choose 2 positions for him and the composer with whom he / she collaborated (-). I'm waiting for your suggestions. As for the rest: Vysotsky, Tsoi, the main architectural monuments of the 18th century, posters from the 20-30s of the 20th century
Well, now let's move on to the analysis of the tasks of the second part:
Assignments number 20-22: early USE on the history of 2016
No. 20. What period in the history of the USSR is the article talking about? Name, using knowledge from the course of history, two main opposition I.V. Stalin directions among the party elite of the described time. What were the features of their views?
No. 21. What is the purpose of the repressions organized by I.V. Stalin against authoritative party and state leaders. Give at least two facts and phenomena related to this process in the army.
No. 22. Indicate at least five reasons that, according to S.A. Kislitsyn, led to the destruction of the internal party opposition to Stalin
Test solution
So how can you complete this task? Naturally, reading the text 🙂 The Murder of Kirov, for knowledgeable boys and girls, already says that this is the 1930s. The groups are covertly highlighted in the text: S. Syrtsova and T. Ryutin (supporters of liberalization of the Soviet Union and moderate reforms). Well, let's touch on the "party boyars", tell who it is and get 2 points for the twentieth task
Purpose: establishment of a centralized system of state power and management of the popular masses
Facts and phenomena:
1) Many representatives of the Red Army were repressed (example: Tukhachevsky, Blucher)
2) During the years of the Soviet-Finnish war, a serious blow was dealt to the country's defense
- Fetishization of the VKP (b)
- Infantilism
- Separation from the people
- Party members' ambition
- Detachment from human values
We will continue working on the option in the next articles, very, very soon, if this article gets a response. Like it, share articles on social networks, so you help the project and then we will analyze the early USE in history 2016 as soon as possible. See you soon, Ivan Nekrasov was with you. Bye everyone!
Do you want to understand all the topics of the history course? Sign up to study at Ivan Nekrasov's school with a legal guarantee of passing the exam for 80+ points!
Professional categories for teachers were introduced in the first half of the 1990s: 16 categories, the 14th one corresponded to the highest category ... This system is still being modified and improved, but almost always the certification procedure itself causes at least anxiety among teachers, and some - real fear and panic. How to make the certification objectively confirm the teacher's pedagogical and personal maturity, and not serve as a punishing sword? The Honored Teacher of Russia, Candidate of Psychological Sciences Alexander Snegurov shared his views.
Returning labor education to schools is a requirement of life itself. But now technology is in the curriculum instead of labor lessons. On topics close, in fact - a boring theoretical subject. And children need hands-on experience with real work with real tools. The country also needs this, because in three or four years the market will experience an acute shortage of young and ready-to-work personnel. What needs to be changed for this? The answer is in the article by Vladimir Semenikhin.
Being athletic is as prestigious and fashionable as being well-read and witty. At least this is the case in the schools of England. And in Japan, more than 40% of high school students go in for sports for at least nine hours a week ... At the same time, in Russian schools it is not shameful to "skip the gym", there would be a convincing excuse or a reference. Sergey Rykov reflected on why foreign teachers manage to motivate schoolchildren much more effectively to strain not only the gyrus, but also the muscles.
The national examination in the discipline "history" is not mandatory in the Unified State Exam - this subject is taken at the choice of the graduate. According to official statistics of past years, about a fifth of schoolchildren choose history. First of all, these are students who have chosen their future profession in the field of jurisprudence, linguistics, design and architecture.
This subject cannot be classified as light - exam questions require excellent memory and a large amount of information. Past studies show that the average score in this discipline ranges from 45 to 55. The number of students who could not cope with the tasks submitted for the national examination is quite large and amounts to about 10% of the total number.
The USE in history is considered difficult - 10% of students cannot pass it!
Demonstration version of the exam 2016
USE dates in history
Early period
- March 23, 2016 (Wed) - Main exam
- April 22, 2016 (Fri) - Reserve
The main stage
- June 16, 2016 (Thu) - Main exam
- June 24, 2016 (Fri) - Reserve
History exam changes
In 2016, the history exam was completely excluded from tasks in which students were supposed to choose one answer out of four offered. In the first part of the exam ticket, a number of tasks were added for knowing dates, processes, historical figures and facts from the history of culture, as well as for working with textual historical sources. In the second part, the task of writing a short historical essay is added. The exam time has been increased compared to 2015.
General information
The time allotted for the history exam in 2016 is 235 minutes. During this time, students will have to solve 25 tasks, 19 of them with a short answer, and 6 with a detailed one.
- Part 1 (tasks 1-19) - serve to test basic and complicated knowledge of the subject. The solution to each of them should take 3-7 minutes;
- Part 2 (tasks 20-24) - are characterized by a higher level of complexity and require the student to formulate the correct answer, which must be entered on a special sheet. 5-20 minutes are allocated for each of these tasks;
- Part 2 (task 25) - a historical essay (VIII - early XXI century; the examinee can independently choose three periods in the history of Russia, which will appear in the essay). You can spend 40-80 minutes on this task.
To get a good grade for your essay, you will need:
- Indicate the main events of these periods;
- Mention a number of historical figures and explain their role in the above events;
- Observe causal relationships;
- Assess how this period influenced the history of Russia;
- Use historical terminology correctly;
- To avoid factual mistakes;
- Observe a form of presentation that is acceptable to readers.
To successfully give the exam in history, get ready to write an essay! Each of the points will be assessed separately, and in total, the essay can bring 11 primary points. By the way, the minimum test score required for this subject is 32 (which is equal to 13 primary points out of 53 maximum). The time allotted for students to pass the test is 235 minutes.
How to Prepare?
A large number of tasks involves a competent distribution of time to solve them. This is one of the main difficulties of this discipline. It is difficult for schoolchildren to set themselves up to take the test under stressful conditions, and the number of questions can cause panic even in a well-prepared student. To solve this problem and successfully prepare for the delivery of this subject, you should work out a demo version of testing.
The materials that you can download on our website are fully consistent with the real exam in terms of their complexity, edition and structure. Competent and systematic preparation for the exam in history will give you the opportunity not to waste precious exam time studying the instructions for the ticket and will immediately set you up for the correct interpretation of the questions.
A) violation of the connection between the subject and the predicate.
a) the breaks of the main clause by the clause and see if the subjects and predicates in each pair agree (this
type designs Those who ... Many of those who .... All who);
b) abbreviations, define the keyword and see if it agrees with the predicate in gender and number;
c) geographical names, we determine the gender of nouns by genus (river - she, city - he, etc.), look,
whether this subject agrees with the predicate by gender.
d) words, the genus of which many do not know (chimpanzee, cockatoo, veil, etc.), see if these words are consistent with the predicate by gender.
From all of the above in the sentences, we find only the construction of all who ... in 2 sentences. We look carefully:
"Everything , who listened professor's speech, once again wassurprised by the brightness, originality and depth of his speech. "
the bases of 2 sentences are highlighted. At the heart of the main sentence, the subject and the predicate "everything was" are not consistent in number.
AND - 2. Do not forget to cross out the options in KIMaheti after the decision so that they no longer interfere with you.
B) incorrect use of the case form of a noun with a preposition.
We are looking for derivative prepositions. Especially often come across thanks, according to, in spite of ... These prepositions require a dative
case. See if there are any such words in the proposed sentences. Bingo! Sentence 5: "Contrary to doctors' recommendations
the athlete did not reduce the load during training. "Let's see in which case the word" recommendations ". What? Recommendations.
Genitive case, and db. dative.
B - 5
C) incorrect construction of a sentence with an adverbial turnover
First of all, find sentences that have an adverbial turnover. Their m. some. Let's remind the questions of the adverb:
doing what? what having done?
We have 2 adverbial sentences:
3)Low above the horizon is created wrong performance about the size of the moon.
4)Caught in the house of strangers , wait when you are introduced.
Underline the basics: "creating a view" and "wait". Make sure the sentences are not impersonal. If
you will see the impersonal, there is definitely a mistake. Use adverbial expressions in impersonal offers are not allowed. Now we look
so that the action described in the adverbial turnover is done by the one named in the subject. The view cannot be located
low above the horizon. You are waiting, you may find yourself in the house of strangers. Error in the 3rd sentence.
IN - 3.
D) incorrect construction of a sentence with indirect speech
Look for other people's words in quotes and the words "said", "asked", thought ", wrote", etc. We have no quotation marks. But the word "asked" is.
7) I'm surprised asked what where is the fortress.
The words "Where is the fortress?" not changed, they should be formatted as direct speech, but the author of the proposal made a hybrid of
direct and indirect speech.
G - 7.
E) an error in the construction of a sentence with homogeneous members
First of all, we take sentences in which there are generally homogeneous terms. And pay attention to the presence in
proposals of double conjunctions (not only ..., but also ..., both ... and ...., not so much ... as ... etc.)
Proposals 2, 5, 3, 7 have already dropped out. In 4, 6 there are no homogeneous members. We carefully look at the remaining sentences:
1) Reserves are created asfor maintenance, so forrecovery the number of rare species of animals caught in
Approximately in the month of May, the versions of the USE of the early period are published. The purpose of the publication is to provide graduates with an additional opportunity to prepare for the Unified State Exam.
Early versions of the exam in history 2017
| Thing | Download early version |
| History 2017 | istoriya |
| 2016 | variant ege 2016 |
| 2015 | variant ege 2015 |
Published according to one version of the CMM used for the USE in the early 2017 period.
Changes in the structure of KIM in history compared to 2016:
There are no changes in structure and content.
The maximum score for tasks 3 and 8 has been changed (2 points instead of 1). The wording of task 25 and the criteria for its assessment have been improved.
Total assignments (in brackets - including the criteria for evaluating the essay) - 25 (31);
of which by type of job:
with a short answer - 19;
with a detailed answer - 6 (12);
by the level of difficulty (including the criteria for evaluating the composition): B - 16; P - 8; AT 7.
The maximum primary score for work is 55.
The total time to complete the work is 235 minutes.
The structure of the KIM USE 2017 by history
Each version of the examination paper consists of two parts and includes 25 tasks, differing in form and level of difficulty.
Part 1 contains 19 tasks with a short answer. In the examination paper, the following types of tasks with a short answer are proposed:
- tasks for choosing and recording correct answers from the proposed list of answers;
- tasks to determine the sequence of the arrangement of these elements;
- assignments to establish the correspondence of elements, data in several information series;
- assignments for the definition according to the indicated characteristics and recording in the form of a word (phrase) of a term, name, name, century, year, etc.
The answer to the tasks of Part 1 is given by the corresponding entry in the form of a sequence of numbers written without spaces and other separators; the words; phrases (also written without spaces and other separators).
Part 2 contains 6 tasks with a detailed answer, identifying and assessing the development of various complex skills by graduates.
Tasks 20-22 are a set of tasks related to the analysis of a historical source (carrying out attribution of the source; extracting
information; attraction of historical knowledge to analyze the problematics of the source, the position of the author).
Tasks 23–25 are associated with the use of methods of cause-effect, structural-functional, temporal and spatial analysis to study historical processes and phenomena. Task 23 is connected with the analysis of any historical problem, situation. Task 24 - analysis of historical versions and assessments, argumentation of different points of view using the knowledge of the course. Task 25 involves writing a historical essay. Alternative task 25: the graduate has the opportunity to choose one of three periods of Russian history and demonstrate his knowledge and skills on the historical material he is most familiar with. Task 25 is evaluated according to a system of criteria.
On the USE in history, there are usually a little more than 5 percent of students who scored high scores. There are about twice as many poor students.
It is noted that not everyone knows how to work with maps and factual material. Schoolchildren are often mistaken when answering questions about the Great Patriotic War. Pupils do not always understand the difference between it and World War II.
Before exams, it is recommended to repeat the dates, to refresh the memory of the names of commanders, heroes, statesmen. So, at the exam in 2016, about 20 percent of graduates wrote that the hero of the Soviet Union is a saboteur fighter, executed by the Nazis in 1941, Lydia Ruslanova, and not Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya. There were also those who sent Marshal Alexander Vasilevsky to battle in the Chesme Bay in 1770, while during the Great Patriotic War he was the chief of the General Staff, commanded the 3rd Belorussian Front, and led the assault on Konigsberg.
